News Outlets Sue OpenAI Over Unlicensed Journalism Usage

    Published on:

    In the legal showdown, digital news outlets The Intercept, Raw Story and AlterNet copyright infringement lawsuit We sued OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT, for unauthorized journalistic use.

    The legal action highlights growing tensions between the news industry and AI developers over the misuse of journalistic content.

    Also read: OpenAI claims New York Times 'hacked' ChatGPT to file copyright lawsuit

    the core of the problem

    At the heart of the controversy are accusations that OpenAI used thousands of news articles from plaintiffs to train its chatbot. These AI systems are said to be designed to respond to user inquiries and mimic the journalistic content provided, potentially misleading users as to the origin of the information provided. Masu. The case highlighted growing concerns within the already struggling news industry about the financial impact of such practices.

    “When providing responses, ChatGPT gives the impression that it is an omniscient, intelligent source of the information being provided, when in fact the responses are based on copyrighted works. is common.”

    Some organizations, such as the Associated Press, are negotiating licensing deals with OpenAI, but others are at an impasse. The New York Times, for example, filed a similar lawsuit after negotiations failed, with the aim of either stopping the alleged infringement or securing compensation. This collective action by news organizations is indicative of an industry-wide backlash against what is seen as misappropriation of news organizations' work.

    Copyright protection and AI

    The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, highlights significant challenges to digital publishing. Unlike print media, where copyrights for materials can be registered in bulk, digital entities do not have easy mechanisms for such protection. But lawyers for The Intercept, Raw Story and AlterNet argue that the content is inherently protected by copyright law even without formal registration.

    Although this lawsuit focuses on media businesses, authors like Sarah Silverman have also filed similar lawsuits against OpenAI for copyright infringement. The case became more complex with Intercept's choice to name Microsoft as a defendant because of its significant investment in OpenAI. However, AlterNet and Raw Story are not pursuing lawsuits against Microsoft because of their partnership with the company.

    the stakes are high

    The lawsuit seeks at least $2,500 in damages for each alleged misappropriation, an amount that highlights the financial toll the news organization believes it has endured. Annie Chavel, CEO of The Intercept, expressed a sentiment shared by many in the industry, especially as newsrooms across the country face severe financial constraints. It highlighted the unfairness of developers profiting from journalists' hard work.

    “Plaintiff The Intercept Media, Inc., a news organization, brings this action seeking actual damages and profits for defendants, or statutory damages of not less than $2,500 for each violation.”

    This legal action is more than just compensation. It defends the rights of journalists and the integrity of the entire news industry. As AI continues to evolve, the outcome of this case will set a precedent for how journalistic content is used to train and operate AI systems, ensuring original content creators are properly recognized and rewarded. There is likely to be.

    As the case unfolds, one key question remains. Will this case prompt a reassessment of the ethical and legal standards governing the use of copyrighted materials by AI, or will it open the door to an even more contentious battle between the tech industry and content creators? I wonder?


    Leave a Reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here