South Korean Government Says No Copyright for AI Content

    Published on:

    According to Culture, Sports and Tourism Minister Yoo In-cheon, the South Korean government says that art and content created by AI without any human input cannot be protected by copyright.

    Yoo In-cheon said on December 27 that only creative works that “clearly convey human thoughts and feelings” will be eligible for copyright registration. United News agency.

    Also read: 20 Most Popular AI Tools of 2023

    AI “Copyright Guidebook”

    This decision was made after months of consultation with industry players working on issues arising from the use of AI. In the end, South Korea's Ministry of Culture, which oversees copyright protection policy, opposed copyright protection for AI-generated works. At a press conference in Seoul, Yoo In-cheon said:

    “As the development of new AI technology is bringing new changes to creation, it is important for the country to proactively and proactively respond to the new copyright environment,'' he said.

    According to the ministry, the new policy will be published at a later date as an “AI Copyright Guidebook” for businesses, copyright holders, and users involved in artificial intelligence.

    The ministry said owners of copyrighted materials have a responsibility to protect their inventions from being used to train AI systems. In South Korea, as in other parts of the world, the issue of AI-related copyright infringement is causing a huge stir.

    Popular local rock singer Lim Jae-beom's rendition of K-Pop girl band New Jeans' song “Hype Boy'' turned out to be the work of an AI program. Although Lim had never covered the song, the AI ​​was able to imitate his voice with incredible accuracy, even his breathing.

    AI song goes viral on YouTube and Instagram, Korea Herald reportHowever, concerns were raised that artists' voices and music would be used without permission. There were already concerns that AI music creators should not own copyrights because they do not have rights to the original voices or songs.

    “Copyright infringement in generative AI is difficult to respond to because it is difficult to distinguish between the original source used by the AI ​​and the final product. Also, there is no legal obligation to declare whether generative AI has been used. No,” a Korean Music Copyright Association official previously said.

    The Ministry of Culture's latest policy announcement clears up that confusion.

    South Korean government denies copyright of AI content

    global issues

    South Korea is not the only country where AI-generated materials are causing off-flavors. There are also several pending lawsuits in the United States and elsewhere over the unauthorized use of copyrighted works to train generative AI.

    As MetaNews reported on Wednesday, The New York Times has sued both ChatGPT's creators, OpenAI and Microsoft, for allegedly using millions of articles to train their own AI programs without their consent. . According to the newspaper, both companies are infringing on copyright and are seeking compensation.

    In an earlier case, a U.S. judge in August was denied An application submitted by computer scientist Stephen Thaler for the DABUS system (Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience).

    Saylor had sought patents covering inventions created by his company's AI systems, but both the U.S. Copyright Office and District Judge Berrill in Washington, D.C., ruled that AI-generated content cannot be copyrighted. said.


    Leave a Reply

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here