Unveiling the Hidden Powers within Blockchain: What Is Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)?

Blockchain networks have always promised fairness, transparency and immutability, and this has revolutionized several areas. But as the ecosystem expands, there are hidden opportunities that can throw a delicate balance out of control if not controlled. One such important aspect, primarily within the Ethereum network and his DeFi space at scale, is the concept of Maximum Extractable Value (MEV).

Unraveling the concept of MEV

MEV represents the maximum value that can be extracted by miners, validators, or other actors that control the process of containing and ordering transactions in a blockchain network. These attackers can abuse this privilege to manipulate the outcome of transactions to their advantage and extract additional value. The concept arose primarily in response to the complex and sometimes fragile dynamics present in decentralized finance (DeFi) applications.

Origin of MEV: How does it work?

In a blockchain like ethereum, Miners are given the power to determine the order of transactions within the blocks they create. It also has the power to decide which transactions to include or exclude. These powers at your disposal have ramifications beyond simple trade management.

Consider a scenario where a decentralized exchange (DEX) operates on a model where token prices are determined by the balance of supply and demand. When miners detect large “buy” orders queued for processing, they can manipulate the order of transactions within blocks. They can insert their own ‘buy’ order before the large order and ‘sell’ order after it. A large “buy” order causes a price spike, and pre-planned “sell” orders by miners allow them to profit from this temporary price increase.

Potential threat of MEV

The existence of the MEV opportunity raises serious questions about security, fairness and trust within the blockchain ecosystem. While potentially increasing rewards for miners, it threatens to undermine the fundamental tenets of blockchain technology: decentralization and immutability.

Consider another example. Suppose a user initiates a loan from her DeFi protocol. Miners may discover this transaction and pre-load the user’s loan request with their own, depleting the available liquidity and causing the original loan transaction to fail. This kind of predatory behavior interferes with the fair operation of his DeFi market, which is made possible by his MEV concept.

Common examples of MEVs

MEVs can manifest themselves in many ways on blockchains, especially within the DeFi space. Below are some common examples of maximum extractable value (MEV).

front running: In this context, front-running occurs when miners that are aware of the transaction pool (mempool) confirm a profitable transaction and put their own similar transaction into the block preceding the original transaction. They are effectively “jumping the line” to take advantage of profitable opportunities. For example, you might see a large number of buy orders for a particular token and choose to buy the token before the transaction is processed, causing the price to rise and then selling it quickly for a profit.
back running: This is similar to front running, but it happens after the first transaction. In this case, the miner places the transaction immediately after the original transaction in the block to take advantage of that effect.
sandwich attack: This happens when a miner places a transaction before or after a user’s transaction. The first transaction raises the price, the user’s transaction raises the price further, and then the last transaction sells the asset at this raised price, leading to a profit for the miners.
Arbitrage opportunity: Miners can take advantage of price differences between different decentralized exchanges. If the price of a token on one exchange is lower than on another, you can buy at a lower price and sell at a higher price to pocket the difference.
liquidation opportunity: Certain DeFi protocols automatically liquidate under-collateralized loans. Miners can monitor these situations, and if they spot a profitable liquidation, they can order transactions to claim it before anyone else.
Time bandit attack: This involves miners manipulating the blockchain itself to create new chains of blocks (“reorganize”) from which more MEVs can be extracted.

Remember that these practices, while potentially beneficial for miners, are generally viewed as detrimental to the health and fairness of the blockchain ecosystem. These can cause unnecessary price volatility, interfere with the normal functioning of DeFi protocols, and undermine user confidence. Various strategies have been studied and implemented to mitigate these MEV-related problems.

The Road Ahead: MEV Mitigation Strategies

Given the potential risks MEV poses to the DeFi ecosystem, several mitigation strategies are being considered. One popular proposal is the implementation of MEV auctions. These allow miners to bid for the right to reorder transactions within blocks, making the process more competitive and less likely to be abused.

Another promising approach involves protocol refinement. These could include changes to how transaction ordering is determined, and moving away from a purely transaction fee-based model that encourages MEV exploits. Several ongoing research and development efforts are focused on this aspect.

Conclusion

Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) poses significant challenges to the blockchain ecosystem, but it also highlights the importance of continued innovation and vigilance in this space. As the adoption of blockchain technology and its integration into our digital lives increases, it becomes increasingly important to understand concepts like MEV. By taking proactive measures, communities can mitigate potential risks and ensure the safety, fairness and decentralization of the ecosystem.

Subscribe now

To access premium content